- SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE SOFTWARE
- SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE CODE
- SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE PC
- SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE WINDOWS
Basically, William rewrites any original code by Adam that prevents new features from being added. While earlier Cinelerra-CV project aimed to sync their version to the upstream HV project and thus maintain compatibility, the GG version contains changes that are incompatible with the original HV version. Thus sustainability of Cinelerra-HV remains largely limited.Ĭinelerra-GG is a fork by Phyllis Smith and William Morrow aka GoodGuy who initially collaborated with Michael Collins on a Cinelerra-HV based commercial project, but left to work in a more community-focused environment.
He also doesn’t have an open source code repository and only publishes changes once a year, as part of a new release. There’s a lot of demand to add cloud services, mobile apps, and new standards, but it’s not the enabling technology those of us working on the problem 20 years ago were creating.Īdam is pretty much the only developer of Cinelerra-HV, who only merges patches for features/improvements that he personally likes.
SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE PC
Adobe themselves conceded their last major PC program was Creative Suite in 2010.
Video editing on a computer would have to be as big a breakthrough again as it was in 1998. He could have shut it down years ago and no one would be talking about it.Īdam, in return, provided this statement: Trust me, Adam is the hero and everyone else is just hanging on hoping for a better tomorrow, including me. The credit for the financing of the development of Cinelerra should go entirely to Adam Williams.
When asked, whether the development of Cinelerra was ever funded by any entity, Michael responded:
SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE SOFTWARE
Good commercial software has few hardware dependencies & can interact with the outside world without requiring massive 3rd party libraries. It takes so many codecs depending on so many GPL libraries & it’s so heavily dependent on really flaky niche hardware, the support & licensing would be impossible. In fact, back in 2008, Adam stated:Ĭinelerra is a lousy program to commercialize. Although Michael Collins, co-founder of the project, tried to get this work sponsored, there is little-to-no information if he ever managed to do that. (Igor, being a Cinelerra-CV contributor, was also most helpful when answering extra questions for this article.)Ĭinelerra-HV is the original project by Adam Williams, started in 2000 on top of an earlier project called Broadcast 2000. The history of Cinelerra and its forks is so convoluted that, recently, it took Igor Vladimirsky 4,742 words to summarize it. Please note that we are intentionally leaving out quite a few projects, because no, hell, no. This is something we set out to find out about free/libre non-linear video editors.
SHOTCUT VS KDENLIVE WINDOWS
So maybe what we are looking for in a project to support is sustainability? Here are some questions that can help us identify a sustainable project.ĭoes it have a financial plan? Would it use community’s recurring donations or fund itself through education or sales in Windows Store? Does it even accept money through any channel?ĭoes it scale in terms of human resources by growing a contributive community, or does it have a bus factor of one?ĭoes it a have an established practice of helping people to do non-coding contributions? In the recent case of Natron, it’s supposed to do miracles even in the total absence of developers (irony intended). There seems to be a popular notion that you can throw money at a free/libre software project, and that will do miracles. But that bears another question: how can we actually support them? Indeed, so far, very little focus has been given to supporting free/libre projects instead. If you follow conversations around the voting for an Adobe Premiere port to Linux, you might have felt some frustration.
0 kommentar(er)
